2250 results matched your search criteria
Forum topic
OneSpan Sign
We were successfully sending transactions and documents to OneSpan until the start of this week when we started receiving the below error. I have also put the invoking code below, it is based on the Apex SDK. It's a weird error as this was working on Friday..
CallOut:
Forum topic
OneSpan Sign
I'm currently using Java SDK to create a package:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.silanis.esl</groupId>
<artifactId>sdk</artifactId>
<version>11.38</version>
</dependency>
Forum topic
OneSpan Sign
A client is receiving an error, they are trying to add a second signer to a package. This second signer will always be the same individual and will be signing after the first signer has signed.
Forum topic
OneSpan Sign
I am trying to create the package only with documents and I will need to update it later adding the signers, the signature tag is already created in one of the documents, that is why I am using EnableExtraction. I get an error:
Forum topic
OneSpan Sign
Hi,
I am getting below error while creating the package
Forum topic
OneSpan Sign
Has anyone run into a Certificate chaining error when trying to make a call to createPackage? We are using IBM WebSphere BPM v8.5 and the eSignLive SDK 10.10.1, the certificate is installed in the Cell's defaultTrustStore, however,the eSignLive SDK call seems to ignore it.
Forum topic
OneSpan Sign
Hello,
Create package API is failing with client app authentication whereas the same works with API key.
I used SDK version 11.34 for client app and 11.15 for API key. Can someone please help wth the below issue?
Forum topic
OneSpan Sign
Hello Team,
I face an issue, when in my application, I try to download the attached documents, which the customers have uploaded in One Span.
Actually it is not happening always, but it is quite often.
When the customer is uploading an attachment, after the signing of the contract, this attachment i
Forum topic
OneSpan Sign
*OneSpan Sign does not seem to allow any/all changes to automatic reminders after Txn in question has been sent for signing, is this normal/correct behavior?