.NET SDK

Hi team, A datepicker field, normally looked like below in JSON, where the "pattern" field represents the format:

{
  "name": "",
  "type": "INPUT",
  "binding": null,
  "validation": {
    "errorMessage": "",
    "required": false,
    "enum": null,
    "maxLength": null,
    "errorCode": null,
    "minLength": null,
    "pattern": "YYYY-MM-dd"
  },
  "id": "O12oI48vdTs5",
  "subtype": "DATEPICKER",
  "page": 0,
  "extractAnchor": null,
  "formattedValue": "",
  "extract": false,
  "height": 37,
  "left": 301,
  "fontSize": null,
  "top": 261,
  "width": 165,
  "data": null,
  "value": 

I am working with authenticating Signers in the ceremony and when we try to set the signers to the default option (email) -- the package creation returns with a 400 error. This is the return error Could not send the package. Exception: The remote server returned an error: (400) Bad Request.

Hello, Does anyone happen to have the sample code to update field values in bulk? We learned that UpdateApprovals function call update multiple signatures at same time: client.ApprovalService.UpdateApprovals(updatedPackage, documentId, signatures); How can we use this function if given all field names and field values? Thanks in advance!

I've been having a bit of trouble connecting to the Canadian sandbox environment. The specific error message I'm getting is: "Could not get package.

Hello, we use sdk.net in our solution and we are confronted with slowness, for example when we try to add documents that exceed 3 MB to a package, it takes up to 8 seconds per document (sdk calls this method api rest : https://docs.esignlive.com/api-docs/sandbox-us/#/Documents/api.packages._packageId.documents.post ) I tried this method with postman and it’s the same result, it’s slow. When we try to reproduce the case on https://sandbox.e-signlive.ca, it’s a little faster!

Hi, Scenario - existing C# code which has been working perfectly for about 1 year. Using this call to ESL --> client.FieldSummaryService.GetFieldSummary(pkgId); This was returning a list of fields in the custom .PDF document we add to the package and send out to perspective hiring candidates to obtain PII. Within this list we noticed this: FieldName was no longer coming through - it was blank. We have not changed out output file. So - we are thinking that perhaps this is broke? Have attached a example screen scrape.

Hi I have code that creates signatures for two which I do in the beginning when I define the document. Later I would like to add optional signatures based on some condition and tried to do this without success unless I do it when I define the document. Would like to get either of the following: 1) Add everything when I define the document, disable or make invisible those signatures that I don't need until later. 2) Add optional signatures later when some condition is true. This I tried and it was throwing error! Would like to know your feedback. Thank you!

Hi, Does eSignLive have any feature to support delegation of signer during vacation period i.e. When I create a package I specify Signer 1 and also a delegated Signer 2 for a specified time period

I was trying to figure out why the "Click to Sign" Box was showing up in the top left corner of the Document. My assumption was that it meant that I was not properly placing it as an offset to an Anchor, Even though my Code does try to do that. But I realized as I was formatting my question that I had an extra .WithField (in bold) that was causing the problem. Sure enough, removing that extra code fixed my problem.

I'm getting some unexpected behavior with checkbox validation. Is there something I can do to get the expected results? - Using the .NET SDK, add a checkbox, associate it with a signature and make it required - Send the package. - Signer attempts to sign the signature block associated the checkbox - Result: signer gets an error message that the box must be checked. Good. - Signer checks the box, then attempts to sign again - Result: allows the signer to sign. Good. - When prompted to submit, click Cancel. The signer wants to look over the doc again. - Tries to uncheck the box.